![]() If you only use it a couple of times a year, you can get a monthly subscription and cancel it again when you take a break making slideshows. I completely understand if you do not find enough value in FotoMagico to keep the subscription going. Capture One and Lightroom are solving a different problem so they have different economics. Many Photoshop users aren’t even photographers. You can’t compare FotoMagico to Photoshop or Lightroom because those apps have a vastly larger number of potential users. In addition that that, we created a lot of new Websnippets and other content. What happened in that time was a lot of compatibility updates to FotoMagico 5, a complete rewrite of FotoMagico because Apple ended a lot of the technology that FotoMagico 5 was based in the macOS and a completely new iPad app. It did not take us 6 years for the improvements you see on the surface. If you look at other apps running paid upgrade models, the upgrades are usually between 1 and 2 years apart. The long time without a paid upgrade wasn’t planned. That is a very interesting point of view. Greetings from Münsterland Thanks for sharing your thoughts. ![]() That could also happen to Fotomagico (after a trial period of one year). However, even with other software products, users decide against subscriptions if they do not use the software every day. The income is secured even if there are only a few further developments. In my opinion, you can ask for a reasonable upgrade price for this.īoinx can live well with the subscription. Fotomagico has made a huge leap to version 6. ![]() However, there have been no real functional changes in the 6 years. The software was always adapted very promptly to the changes in the operating system. It is also unusual that Fotomagico has not made a major upgrade within 6 years. It is certainly common practice to charge an upgrade fee for major major upgrades. In the meantime, it has become fashionable for software providers to only offer their products by subscription in the future. I also create around 5 to 7 presentations a year. I have to agree with Bryce and M.Kolar for the most part. How does this compare to Adobe’s package of Photoshop and Lightroom monthly subscription, or Capture One’s annual subscription (I’m a Capture One user)? These are both just slightly more than FotoMagico’s v6 new price, but these are vastly larger, more complex programs, that professional photographers use and depend on each and every day.ĭoes anyone have any thoughts on this? Please share! Or another way to look at this, if it takes Boinx another 6 years for the same amount of improvements to be added to version 6 (so in essence it becomes the equivalent of version 7), then I will have paid $648 over the next 6 years (i.e. Sure, version 6 is better than version 5, but is it 10 times better? Will I be able to make shows that are 10 time better, or use one tenth of the time to create new shows with version 6? This is an increase of ten (10) times – from 90 cents per month to $9 per month. ![]() So I suppose the US price is: £7.99 minus £1.33 VAT = £6.66 x 1.35 exchange rate = approx. (I’m in the UK currently, where the price is listed as £7.99, including VAT. Now with version 6 (which I assume most users would consider to be an evolutionary upgrade, not revolutionary), I’m required to pay $9.00* per month. This equates to a monthly payment of $0.90. When version 5 launched in November 2015 (6 years ago), I upgraded soon afterwards for the price of USD $64.99. With the shift to subscription-only licensing, am I supposed to now purchase a one (1) month subscription each time I use FotoMagico? ![]() As a full-time professional commercial photographer I use FotoMagico occasionally, say 3 to 4 times a year. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |